Jerry Coyne has a particular view of evolution—one that conflates fact, theory, and history [What would disprove evolution?].
Based on his version of evolution, he then offers some examples of what it would take to disprove evolution.
I was tempted last month to challenge his views but I kept putting it off. Now, Ryan Gregory has done the job, and it's an admirable job.
I agree with everything Gregory says at: An example of why it is important to distinguish evolution as fact, theory, and path.
Please leave comments on Ryan's site.
No comments:
Post a Comment