Thursday, November 15, 2012

Happy Birthday Gord!

Today is my son's birthday. Here's two pictures of him taken 34 years apart.




Wednesday, November 14, 2012

M. Capasso - P. Davoli, Soknopaiou Nesos Project. I (2003-2009)

NEW PUBLICATION BY CENTRO DI STUDI PAPIROLOGICI OF
UNIVERSITÀ DEL SALENTO





















Soknopaiou Nesos Project. I (2003-2009).
Edited by Mario Capasso and Paola Davoli
Biblioteca degli “Studi di Egittologia e di Papirologia”, 9
and plates in black and white  + 15 colour plates and 2 folding plans.

Euro 195.00    

ISBN: 978-88-6227-435-7
ISSN: 1828-874X
SKU: 2752

INDEX

Premessa/Preface    9/10

M. Capasso, P. Davoli, Introduzione: Dime in età moderna                                                                                                                                  11

Abbreviazioni e sigle 19

PARTE I. IL SITO

capitolo primo

I. Chiesi, P. Davoli, S. Occhi, N. Raimondi, I rilievi topografici del sito  23
i. Introduzione 23
ii. Il survey topografico del sito: metodologia e strategia operativa  26
iii. La documentazione precedente 29
iv. L’impianto urbano  68

capitolo secondo

G. A. Minaya, Il dromos   83
i. Introduzione 83
ii. La documentazione precedente 83
iii. Analisi archeologica  85
iv. Conclusioni  106

capitolo terzo

T. Smekalova, The geophysical survey 111
i. Geophysical investigations 111
ii. Dime survey   115

PARTE II. LO SCAVO ARCHEOLOGICO

capitolo quarto

P. Davoli, Lo scavo archeologico: 2003-2009  119
i. Introduzione  119
ii. Il temenos e le strutture al suo interno  122
iii. Lo scavo 2003-2009 127
iv. Conclusioni  217

Appendice. Harris Matrix 220

PARTE III. I CATALOGHI

capitolo quinto

M. Capasso, I papiri e gli ostraka greci, figurati e copti (2001-2009)   231
i. Introduzione 231
ii. I papiri  231
iii. Gli ostraka  234
iv. Tabelle riepilogative dei papiri  235
v. Tabelle riepilogative degli ostraka  243
vi. Considerazioni preliminari 246

capitolo sesto

M. A. Stadler, Demotica aus Dime: 
  ein Überblick über die in Dime während der Kampagnen 2001-2009 
  gefundenen Demotischen Texte  249
i. Der demotistische Forschungsstand Dime betreffend 249
ii. Das von der Missione Archeologica in Egitto del Centro 
  di Studi Papirologici dell’Università del Salento, Lecce, 
  neu ausgegrabene demotische Material 250
iii. Die Bedeutung der neu ausgegrabenen Demotica 264
iv. Perspektiven zukünftiger Forschung   267

capitolo settimo

A. Cervi, L’arredo ligneo del tempio di Soknopaios   269
i. Introduzione 269
ii. Contesto di rinvenimento e distribuzione dei frammenti 69
iii. L’analisi delle fonti iconografiche  274
iv. Catalogo 278
v. Conclusioni 311

capitolo ottavo

D. Dixneuf, Introduction à la céramique de Soknopaiou Nesos  315
i. Introduction 315
ii. Présentation du matériel 315
iii. Présentation des contextes 323
iv. Conclusion  324
v. Catalogue   325

capitolo nono

C. Caputo, Le terrecotte figurate 363
i. Introduzione  363
ii. Catalogo  365
iii. Conclusioni    373

PARTE IV. GLI STUDI

capitolo decimo

M. A. Stadler, Interpreting the architecture of the temenos
   Demotic papyri and the cult in Soknopaiou Nesos  379
i. Papyri describing the temple’s decoration   379
ii. Ritual texts from Soknopaiou Nesos  381
iii. Interpretation of the temple’s architecture on the basis 
   of the aforementioned texts     382
iv. The cult of Isis at Soknopaiou Nesos 385
v. Conclusion    386

Tavole  387

INDICI

Tavole di concordanza 407
Indice dei nomi e delle cose notevoli  415
Abbreviazioni dei periodici  419
Bibliografia 421
Appendice 431

Is It True? Today at 5:30pm

The Multifaith Centre at the University of Toronto is sponsoring a series of talks. I represent the control group (no faith).

The title of the series is "Is It True?" Tonight I will defend the negative position from 5:30-7:00pm in room 52 University College. If you're in Toronto, come out and participate.
Is it True? Uncovering the Heart of Each of the World's Religions

The University of Toronto Secular alliance (UTSA), in conjunction with Power 2 Change, Muslim Students Association and the Multifaith Centre is hosting a lecture and discussion series entitled "…is it true?"

This series will feature the following speakers:

Oct. 24: Islam (Amjad Tarsin, Muslim Chaplain, U of T)
Oct. 31: Christianity (Kyle Hackmann, Grace Toronto Church)
Nov. 7: Judaism (Yishaya Rose, Chaplain, Chabad House, U of T)
Nov. 14: Atheism (Professor Larry Moran, U of T, Secular Alliance)

Each speaker will speak on behalf of the philosophical framework to which they subscribe to. Following the lecture, there will be a period of Q and A following by an open discussion amongst attendees.

I encourage you to attend these talks as I suspect a lot of fruitful conversations can emerge. To this end, specifically, we are delighted to have biochemist Dr. Larry Moran, represent our side of the conversation.

University College 5:30pm-7:00pm, rm 52. Light dinner will be served.

Please find event page below:

Facebook

Hope to see some of you there!


Monday, November 12, 2012

Monday's Molecule #192

Last week's molecule was photosystem I (PSI). Mikkel Rasmussen was the only one to get it right [Monday's Molecule #191].

I thought of this week's molecule while I was in Los Angeles last week. We got to sample some excellent examples of cuisine that's hard to find in Toronto. You need to supply the common name AND the formal IUPAC name.

Post your answer as a comment. I'll hold off releasing any comments for 24 hours. The first one with the correct answer wins. I will only post mostly correct answers to avoid embarrassment. The winner will be treated to a free lunch.

There could be two winners. If the first correct answer isn't from an undergraduate student then I'll select a second winner from those undergraduates who post the correct answer. You will need to identify yourself as an undergraduate in order to win. (Put "undergraduate" at the bottom of your comment.)

Read more »

Evolution and Design

Barry Arrington has a new post on Uncommon Descent in which he discusses design and the appearance of design [Sorry Dr Barr, “Chance By Design” is an Oxymoron]. He's particularly annoyed at someone named Stephen M. Barr, a theistic evolutionary creationist.

Arrington claims that there are only three positions in this debate.
In summary, there are three positions in play here.

(1) The traditional theist observes the overwhelming appearance of design in living things and is content to conclude that things are they way they appear to be, i.e., that living things appear to be designed for a purpose because they are in fact designed for a purpose.

(2) The atheist admits that the appearance of design in living things is overwhelming but asserts that the appearance of design is an illusion and in reality natural law and random chance combine to produce a result that only appears to be designed.

(3) The Barr-type theistic evolutionist admits that the appearance of design in living things is overwhelming but asserts — like the atheist — that the appearance of design is an illusion and in reality natural law and random chance combine to produce a result that only appears to be designed. The TE then goes one step further by asserting that the explanation of the illusion of design is itself an illusion, because the randomness of evolution is in fact directed.
This isn't correct. I support the 4th position; namely ....

(4) When you step back and look at the big picture, living things do not appear to be designed and they do not appear to have a purpose. While there may be some features of living things that have been honed by natural selection, they are the exception, not the rule. Even those features with a strong illusion of design look much less designed when you examine them closely.

When I talk about Evolution by Accident I intend that to be an attack on Intelligent Design and also an attack on the Dawkins' view of evolution.


J. William Schopf Wins Paleontological Society Medal

I read this on the National Center for Science Education (NCSE) blog [Congratulations to J. William Schopf].
NCSE is delighted to congratulate J. William Schopf on receiving the Paleontological Society Medal, the most prestigious honor bestowed by the Paleontological Society, on November 4, 2012, at the Geological Society of America's annual meeting. A life member of NCSE, Schopf is Professor of Paleobiology in the Department of Earth and Space Sciences at the University of California, Los Angeles, and the author of Cradle of Life: The Discovery of Earth's Earliest Fossils (Princeton University Press, 1999). Previous recipients of the medal include NCSE Supporters Niles Eldredge, Stephen Jay Gould, and Malcolm C. McKenna.
I'm quite surprised by this award since Schopf's main claim to fame is the discovery of fossil cyanobacteria in Australian deposits that date back 3.45 billion years. These "fossils" are definitely not cyanobacteria and they most likely aren't even fossils [Did Life Arise 3.5 Billion Years Ago?.

Does anyone know more about this award? Does the paleontological society still believe that these "fossils" are actually ancient bacteria or was the medal awarded for some other contribution to paleontology?


Michael Behe in Toronto!

Michael Behe is giving a talk on Thursday evening at 7:00pm in rm 3154, Medical Sciences Building on the campus of the University of Toronto. (The lecture room is just two floors below my office.)

There's also a reception for him at Hart House on Thursday afternoon. Let me know if you plan to attend either event. Maybe we can meet for dinner.

The talk on Thursday evening is on "What Are the Limits of Darwinism?" I assume he's going to talk abut irreducible complexity and the edge of evolution. Neither topic is suitable for discussion during question period. I think I'll ask him to explain how common descent is compatible with the actions of an intelligent designer.


The lectures are sponsored by The Copernicus Group.
The Copernicus Group is based in Toronto, Canada. The group provides lectures in the Greater Toronto Area on Science and Faith issues particularly in Origins Science – that is: the origin of the universe, life, species and related subjects.

The Copernicus Group derives its name from Nicholas Copernicus the Polish astronomer who in 1543 published his finding that the earth revolved around the sun. His discovery was not readily accepted because the view held by most educated people of the day was that the sun revolved around the earth. The conventional view was wrong because the foundational assumption regarding the universe – that the earth and human life must be at its center – was wrong. Today science has a very similar foundational assumption – all processes must be understandable to humans by naturalistic processes.

Foundational assumptions affect conclusions. As a result The Copernicus Lectures on Science & Faith will attempt to present scientific observations in a neutral manner – meaning that neither the Naturalistic assumption nor any religious assumption will be made as a starting point – and conclusions will be left to the audience members.