Saturday, November 30, 2013

Why don't people accept evolution?

Chris Mooney (remember spin framing?) is at it again. This time he writes for Mother Jones: 7 Reasons Why It's Easier for Humans to Believe in God Than Evolution.

Before we look at the seven reasons let's remember the poll from 2005 that surveyed acceptance of evolution in 34 countries. Note that the percentage of the population who reject evolution ("false") is somewhere between 10% and 20% in the countries at the top of the list. About 75% of the people in those countries think that evolution is true.

In the USA the percentage who reject evolution is closer to 40% and only about 40% think that evolution is true. Clearly if we're going to ask why it's easier for humans to believe in god(s) than in evolution then we have to take these differences into account. It seems reasonable, doesn't it, to look for something that the USA, Turkey, and Cyprus have in common that makes people not accept evolution?

Read more »

Adam Izdebski, A Rural Economy in Transition. Asia Minor from Late Antiquity into the Early Middle Ages

http://www.taubenschlagfoundation.org/ksiazki/jjp_s_18.html

Books for sale

JJP Supplement vol. 18

Adam Izdebski, A Rural Economy in Transition. Asia Minor from Late Antiquity into the Early Middle Ages
Hard cover
XIV + 261
9 maps
ISBN 978-83-9259198-6
Price: £64, 75 EUR (315 PLN) 

A Rural Economy in Transition A Rural Economy in Transition deals with one of the most important periods in the history of Europe and the Middle East – the transition from
Antiquity to the Middle Ages. In his monograph, Adam Izdebski focuses on the economic history of Anatolia between the fifth and ninth centuries AD, a period which has traditionally posed great challenges to the historian. Because there are very few written sources from which a detailed economic and rural history of the period might be constructed, A. Izdebski has made extensive use of archaeological material in his study; however, he has also been able to integrate a vast amount of new scientific evidence into the traditional debates. This book offers the first major analysis of all the available palynological data -- coming from the investigation of pollen samples taken from lakes and marshes over the last fifty years -- pertaining to the Anatolian region, with comparative data drawn from the entire Mediterranean and Middle East. In addition, it includes a discussion of recent research on the climatic history of both Anatolia in particular, and the Eastern Mediterranean in general. For historians in any field who might wish to engage with the fascinating and under-utilised discipline of palynology, this book provides an easily accessible introduction to the uses of palynological evidence in the construction of historical interpretation. Furthermore, A. Izdebski has succeeded in presenting the history of late antique and Byzantine Anatolia with a new, environmental perspective – and in doing so, he has introduced Byzantine studies into the burgeoning field of environmental and climatic history.

Palmomancy Codex (P.Ryl. I 28)

Human bodies, divination and papyrology

Not many manuals of palmomancy have survived from antiquity, but we do have a fine one in Manchester: P. Ryl. I 28. The Rylands treatise occupies a very special position in the history of such literature, because it is one of the earliest, and one of very few extant copies, and because it was fabricated as a small codex, measuring about 7.5 x 6.6 cm. P. Ryl. I 28 was classified by E. Turner in his ‘group 11’ of codices (‘miniature codices’), a definition that has since been applied to early codices measuring less than 10 cm. Another intriguing feature of Ryl. I 28 is its handwriting, which can be classified as a sample of the so-called ‘Biblical majuscule’, a writing canon that developed from the second to the ninth century AD and was especially but not exclusively adopted for Biblical manuscripts. Dating to the fourth century AD, our papyrus is another proof of how misleading is to separate neatly the interests, readings and writings of people living in late antiquity.

Read more at Faces & Voices: People, Artefacts, Ancient History.

What do you think of Brian Pallister's statement?

Brian Pallister is the leader of the Progressive Conservative Party of Manitoba. Here's a statement he made the other day. I'm not particularly offended by what he say about atheists. I think it demonstrates that he is really stupid and probably should have kept his mouth shut but that's actually good for secularism, no? It's pretty clear that he doesn't know any atheists, or, even more likely, none of of the atheists he knows want to tell him that they are nonbelievers.

… I wanted to wish everyone a really really Merry Christmas, Happy Hannukah, all the holiday… all you infidel atheists out there, I want to wish you the very best, also. I don’t know what you celebrate during the holiday season — I myself celebrate the birth of Christ — but it’s your choice, and I respect your choice. If you wish to celebrate nothing and just get together with friends, that’s good, too. All the best.


(I think I understand why his parents gave their farm to his brother. )

[Hat Tip: Friendly Atheist]

Thursday, November 28, 2013

Bill Farrell and Louis C on the Sandwalk

Here's a photo of Bill Farrell ("Doc Bill") and Louis C on the Sandwalk.


They join a distinguished list of people whose visit to the Sandwalk has been recorded here.

Larry Moran
PZ Myers
John Wilkins
Ryan Gregory
The God Delusion
Cody
John Hawks
Michael Barton
Seanna Watson
Steve Watson
Michael Richards
Jeffrey Shallit
Chris DiCarlo
Bill Farrell and Louis C


Answering ten questions from the IDiots

On this American Thanksgiving Day, David Klinghoffer gives thanks for Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne [Thank Goodness for Richard Dawkins]. He says ...
... we're also grateful for guys like Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne who provide a rich source of unintended comedy. See, for example, our colleague Dr. Michael Egnor's always entertaining mining of Coyne's writings.*

* Admittedly we'd be even more pleased to have a worthy opponent on the Darwin side of the debate who did not run from a fight every time but answered our best arguments and evidence in a lucid, trenchant and informative style.
Well, I gotta tell you, David, that I'll be eternally grateful to the Discovery Institute for sending us Dr. Michael Egnor. It's the gift that just keeps on giving, and giving, and giving ....

Read more »

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Natural selection may not lead to evolution?

I recently discovered a new book called The Princeton Guide to Evolution. It looks pretty authoritative so I ordered a copy.

There are excerpts online. The first chapter is "What Is Evolution?" by Jonathan Losos. I'm not very impressed with his answer but I was shocked to read the following passage.
The logic behind natural selection is unassailable. If some trait variant is causally related to greater reproductive success, then more members of the population will have that variant in the next generation; continued over many generations, such selection can greatly change the constitution of a population.

But there is a catch. Natural selection can occur without leading to evolution if differences among individuals are not genetically based. For natural selection to cause evolutionary change, trait variants must be transmitted from parent to offspring; if that is the case, then offspring will resemble their parents and the trait variants possessed by the parents that produce the most offspring will increase in frequency in the next generation.

However, offspring do not always resemble their parents. In some cases, individuals vary phenotypically not because they are different genetically, but because they experienced different environments during growth (this is the “nurture” part of the nature versus nurture debate; see chapters III.10 and VII.1). If, in fact, variation in a population is not genetically based, then selection will have no evolutionary consequence; individuals surviving and producing many offspring will not differ genetically from those that fail to prosper, and as a result, the gene pool of the population will not change. Nonetheless, much of the phenotypic variation within a population is, in fact, genetically based; consequently, natural selection often does lead to evolutionary change.
I never heard to this idea before (that natural selection may not lead to evolution). I thought that natural selection was DEFINED as a change in the frequency of alleles in a population due to selection. Doesn't it have to have a genetic component?

Does this mean that natural selection may not lead to adaptation? Or, does it mean that adaptation isn't necessarily evolution?

The chapters are written by an impressive group of authors (Jonathan Losos is the editor-in-chief). It must represent the current consensus among evolutionary biologists. I'm surprised that I never heard of this definition of natural selection.


Monday, November 25, 2013

One more SBL Paper

Amulets from Oxyrhynchus with New Testament Citations  
Brice Jones

This paper offers an analysis of a few of the amulets from Oxyrhynchus that contain New Testament citations (P.Oxy. VIII 1077; VIII 1151; LXIV 4406). The study is part of a larger project on the non-continuous manuscripts of the Greek New Testament in which, among other types of non-continuous materials, all extant New Testament amulets (in Greek) will be catalogued and studied in detail. In this preliminary study, we shall attend to matters palaeographical and textual in an effort to establish a better picture of these texts collectively, and to see how they may assist us in text-critical endeavors as well as in our questions concerning the early Christians from Oxyrhynchus. Thus, the analysis will nuance our perspective on Christians and their texts from Oxyrhynchus, but it will also have methodological implications for our treatment of Christian amulets generally.

Monday's Molecule #224

Last week's molecule was the second messenger, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate or PIP2. The winner is Dean Bruce. The undergraduate winner is Ariel Gershon [Monday's Molecule #223].

Today's molecule is a protein (purple). It's one of the most abundant proteins in E. coli because it's bound to almost all tRNA molecules in the cell. Name the protein (complete name, not just initials).

Email your answer to me at: Monday's Molecule #224. I'll hold off posting your answers for at least 24 hours. The first one with the correct answer wins. I will only post the names of people with mostly correct answers to avoid embarrassment. The winner will be treated to a free lunch.

There could be two winners. If the first correct answer isn't from an undergraduate student then I'll select a second winner from those undergraduates who post the correct answer. You will need to identify yourself as an undergraduate in order to win. (Put "undergraduate" at the bottom of your email message.)

Read more »

What is bioethics? Is Margaret Somerville a bioethicist or a Roman Catholic apologist?

I had an interesting conversation with a student the other day. She's studying "bioethics" at the University of Toronto. This is a program run by the Deptment of Philosophy.

I asked her to define "bioethics" and she couldn't. To her credit, she immediately recognized that this wasn't right. If she's taking an entire program in bioethics she ought to be able to explain what it was all about. She was then joined by her friend, who is also majoring in bioethics. My colleague, Chris DiCarlo also joined us. He's a philosopher writing a book on ethics.

We described a scenario where I wanted to end my life and Chris was willing to help me. Neither of us have an "ethical" problem with that decision. So why is assisted suicide thought to be a problem for bioethics? If some people don't want to participate in euthanasia then nobody is going to make them? Where's the problem?

Does it only become a bioethical problem if some people want to impose their views on others? In this case, the people who are personally opposed to euthansia want to pass a law preventing me from ending my life with the help of my friend. Our students were puzzled by this discussion. Even though they have taken many courses on bioethics, nobody had ever raised this issue. Isn't that strange? You would think that any program run by a Department of Philosophy would emphasize critical thinking. Sadly, this turns out to be rare whenever the topic of bioethics comes up.

Read more »

Sunday, November 24, 2013

You simply won't believe what the IDiots are saying now!

Do you remember Vincent Joseph Torley (vjtorley)? He's the IDiot with a Ph.D. (2007) from the Department of Philosophy at the University of Melbourne (Australia). That's a legitimate university. Apparently Vincent Torley went off the rails sometime after 2007.

Here's his latest post on Uncommon Descent: Does scientific knowledge presuppose God? A reply to Carroll, Coyne, Dawkins and Loftus.
The scientific enterprise stands or falls on the legitimacy of making inductive inferences, from cases of which we have experience to cases of which we have no experience. The aim of this post will be to show that there can be no scientific knowledge if there is no God, and that there is no way of justifying inductive inference on a systematic basis, in the absence of God.

BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, etc. etc. etc.

I alluded above to the troubling fact that even if we assume that objects somehow instantiate rules, there remains the epistemic problem of knowing whether we’ve chosen the right model, or identified the right mathematical equation (i.e. laws of Nature) for characterizing the rules that define a certain kind of object – be it a tiny electron or a star, like the sun. But if we make the two assumptions about God which I referred to in the preceding section – that God wants to make intelligent beings, and that God wants these intelligent beings to reason their way to God’s existence – then we can infer that the rules which are embodied by objects in the natural world must be tailor-made to fit the minds of intelligent beings that are capable of contemplating their Creator. In other words, the universe is designed to be knowable by us. Hence we don’t need to concern ourselves with the theoretical possibility that the rules which characterize things might be too complicated even in principle for us to grasp.

God, then, is the ultimate Guarantor that science can work.
Well, that does it for me. Either I stop being a scientist or I have to become a believer in God in order to continue doing science.

Tough choice. Let me get back to you on that one ... anyone want a job as a professor of biochemistry?


SBL 2013 (Baltimore): papers pertaining to papyrology

Digital Presentation, Digital Editing, Digital Community: The Case of Papyrology 
Program Unit: New Testament Textual Criticism
Roger S. Bagnall, New York University

The texts of the Greek documentary papyri were digitized beginning in the early 1980s, following the development of the Thesaurus Linguae Graecae but requiring a higher level of complexity in coding to represent the texts and, to a lesser degree, the physical objects. Publication metadata followed later, with the Heidelberger Gesamtverzeichnis, and images and collection metadata (with APIS and similar projects) last, starting in the mid-1990s, as storage became cheaper and bandwidth more available. The unification of these resources into a single form is the product of the past seven years and a multinational team led by Joshua Sosin (Duke University). From it has come the combination of the Papyrological Navigator (PN: at papyri.info) and Papyrological Editor (PE). The development of the online editor marks the transition from online presentation of data created in many cases with very traditional means to a new mode of editing. That transition is still in an early stage, and use of the PE is gradually revealing the challenges it faces. The most important of these is social rather than technological: papyrologists are in effect being called to constitute a new kind of community, with shared responsibility for the maintenance, growth, and improvement of the digital resources on which we all rely. These are in the process of moving away from being “projects” with defined timespans and repetitive grant cycles to being permanent fixtures. We do not yet know how this community will organize itself and what sort of leadership it will require; that discussion is currently underway, and I shall discuss its present state in my paper.

Dating P. Ant 12: What Your Mother Never Told You 
Program Unit: Papyrology and Early Christian Backgrounds
Don Barker, Macquarie University

P.Ant.1.12 is a parchment fragment of a codex that contained 2 John. The dating of P.Ant. 12 by scholars varies greatly. Roberts, compared the hand to P.Lond. Lit.192, P.Oxy. 656 and P.Beatty 10 and dated the hand to III. Cavallo dated P.Ant 12 to first half or middle of fifth century but gave no basis for the dating. Aland listed P.Ant.12 as IV/V, again without giving a reason. M. Kruger has recently dated P.Ant.1.12 to the fifth century because of its size ( 8.8 x 7.3 cm); the script (proto Alexandrian Majuscule); a peculiar nomina sacra and its punctuation. This paper will seek to shift through the dating issues that relate to P.Ant.12 and provide an assessment of a reasonable time period for its production.

Church, Clergy, Controversy, and Community: Christianity at Oxyrhynchus in the Period between c. A.D. 400–650 
Program Unit: Papyrology and Early Christian Backgrounds
Lincoln H. Blumell, Brigham Young University

This paper will attempt to integrate and elucidate the important Christian sources, both papyrological and literary, that relate to the city of Oxyrhynchus between c. A.D. 400 and 650. In particular, this study seeks to highlight key pieces of evidence that relate to Christianity at Oxyrhynchus during this period and will attempt to integrate them in such a way as to construct some sort of overarching narrative for the Christian history of the city. Special emphasis will be given to sources that contribute to a better understanding of influential Christian figures, important churches and monasteries, and evidence for how controversies and schisms that engulfed larger Christianity at this time affected the local Christian community at Oxyrhynchus. As most studies of the Christian remains of Oxyrhynchus have tended to end their investigation with the fourth century the present study seeks to fill a void in scholarship as this later period has never been treated in any systematic or thorough way.

Reading Thomas Backwards: From Nag Hammadi to Oxyrhynchus and Beyond 
Program Unit: Papyrology and Early Christian Backgrounds
Todd Brewer, Durham University

Current debates concerning the Gospel of Thomas principally surround the issue of its date of composition relative to the synoptic gospels. An early Thomas is an independent Thomas, whether it be the wisdom collection of Stevan Davies or the ‘rolling corpus’ model of April DeConick. This is a Thomas that offers another witness to the historical Jesus and a window into the ‘tunnel period’ of early Christianity. A late Thomas is therefore a Thomas which is dependent upon the synoptic Gospels and instead provides vital information about the development of Christianity in the second century. In either case, the theological and historical value of the Gospel of Thomas is primarily assessed according to the answer to this sharp early/late polarity. In this paper I offer what I call a ‘family tree’ model of Thomas’ composition on the basis of a detailed comparison of the Nag Hammadi Coptic text and the Greek fragments from Oxyrhynchus. This comparison will show that, despite their similarity, the textual witnesses of the Gospel of Thomas widely diverge from one another at many points. Consequently, it may be said that there is a single Thomasine tradition, though this tradition consists in multiple editions. Each successive edition of Thomas may retain prior sayings, while giving rise to new and rewritten sayings to offer distinct – and sometimes contradictory – theological positions. Such a compositional procedure can be seen from the extant Coptic text through the Oxyrhynchus fragments to Thomas’ origins. Therefore the dichotomy between an early, independent Thomas and a late, dependent Thomas is inadequate since Thomas is both early and late, independent and dependent.

Early Christian Enslaved Families: Subordinate but Intact, or Highly Vulnerable to Separation? 
Program Unit: Gender, Sexuality, and the Bible
Bernadette J. Brooten, Brandeis University

Most interpreters of the New Testament Household Codes (e.g., Eph 5:22–6:9) construe the separate elements as discrete, i.e., as if the wives, husbands, children, and parents were free, and as if the enslaved persons were not in families. This is in line with early patristic interpretation. In their commentaries on the Ephesians Household Code, John Chrysostom (4th C.) and Theodoret (5th C.) take the wives, husbands, children, and parents as free. Chrysostom explicitly defines enslaved husbands as having authority over their wives, thereby seeing enslaved families as subordinate, but intact. Such interpretation yields the image of a harmoniously managed, slaveholding Christian household, which is exactly what Chrysostom presents. Using the methods of social history and the frameworks of intersectionality theory and of ideological criticism, I challenge this view to reveal the moral dilemmas and contradictions that likely faced enslaved wives, husbands, children, and parents. I first review those Roman legal and papyrological sources that point to efforts to keep enslaved families intact, which would imply at least some recognition of a long-term sexual relationship between the parents and of parents’ authority over their children. In line with Chrysostom’s ideal, some early Christian masters and mistresses may have respected enslaved families as intact. The weight of the historical evidence, however, tends in the direction of the significant vulnerability of enslaved families to separation. Among papyrological sources, I discuss deeds of sale, which are nearly always of individual enslaved persons, sometimes of very young children; and wet-nurse contracts in which enslaved wet nurses were hired out to nurse in another household and separated from their own families, including being prohibited from sex with their infant’s father. A range of sources on enslaved sex work and on masters’ sexual access to their enslaved laborers illustrates another challenge to family life faced by enslaved persons. I also review legal sources on inheritance, which was a vulnerable circumstance for enslaved families, who, except with large estates that could afford to keep enslaved families intact, were at high risk of being inherited by different individuals. Against the backdrop of what were probably frequent scenarios of enslaved Christian families unsuccessfully struggling to keep their families—of whatever constellation—intact and of facing the dilemma how to maintain whatever ideal of sexual continence they saw as incumbent upon themselves as Christians, I will intersectionally analyze specific moral challenges facing members of early Christian enslaved families hearing the Household Codes. My intersectional feminist analysis takes account of legal status as enslaved or free, gender, and status as child or parent (categories that were not legally recognized under Roman law for enslaved persons, except that all children born to enslaved mothers were legally enslaved). Based on this analysis, I will show what is ideologically and theologically at stake in the early patristic view of early Christian enslaved families as inferior, but largely intact (as Chrysostom and Theodoret have it), rather than highly vulnerable to separation and seen as individual extensions of their masters or mistresses.

P39 and the Socio-Economic Spectrum of Christian Manuscripts at Oxyrhynchus in the Early Third Century 
Program Unit: Papyrology and Early Christian Backgrounds
Bart B. Bruehler, Indiana Wesleyan University

This investigation opens with a survey of the socio-economic spectrum of Christian culture in Oxyrhynchus in the early 3rd century. The city had a substantial, active, and diverse Christian population that ranged across the socio-economic spectrum as illustrated by representative 3rd century papyri. At the lower end of the spectrum, we find several scraps of texts and hymns on the back of accounting documents (JEA 11 [1925]; P.Oxy. XV 1786; P.Oxy LXXVII 5106). In the middle, we find lots of fragments, including decently written copies of the Shepherd of Hermas and biblical commentary (P.Oxy. XV 1783 and Van Haelst 0691). On the high end, we find fewer documents, perhaps exemplified in Christian treatises and homilies (P.Oxy. XVII 2070 and P.Oxy. III 406). Thus, the papyri evidence shows a wide range of socio-economic locations for Christians in the 3rd century but mostly weighted toward the middle and lower end of the spectrum. Taking quality as an indicator of cost, P39 (P.Oxy. XV 1780) stands out as an excellent and expensive manuscript. The paper will present a detailed description of this fragment of John 8:14-22 with its wide margins, refined handwriting, and well-spaced letters. As with the broader evidence discussed above, most New Testament papyri of this period appear to fall in the middle (e.g. P20=P.Oxy. IX 1171; P69=P.Oxy XXIV 2383; and many others) or lower (e.g. P13=P.Oxy. IV 657 and P18=P.Oxy. VIII 1911) range of the socio-economic spectrum. P39 is one of the few New Testament manuscripts (perhaps along with P1=P.Oxy. I 1; also compare a copy of Job in P.Oxy. IX 1166) that represents the higher socio-economic strata of Christian culture at Oxyrhynchus in the early 3rd century.

The 'Public' Features of Second- and Second/Third-Century Canonical Gospel Papyri 
Program Unit: New Testament Textual Criticism
Scott Charlesworth, Pacific Adventist University

Second- and second/third-century gospel codices share a number of common characteristics--uniformity in size, hands in the semi-literary to (formative) biblical majuscule range, and the use of text division and punctuation as readers’ aids. When these three factors are present as a group, especially in tandem with checking and correction, controlled production for public use in Christian gatherings is certainly taking place. "Controlled production" can be defined as local quality control of manuscript production. In contrast, codices with informal or documentary hands which lack features conducive to public reading were very probably copied in uncontrolled settings for private use. The public status of second- and second/third-century gospels may be evident on another front. In the second and second/third centuries the preferred size for gospel codices approximated the small Turner Group 9.1 format, while in the third century a size approximating the taller but still portable 8.2 Group format predominated. This finding is remarkable given that other early Christian codices were not produced in standard formats. While the codex was the preferred vehicle for Christian texts in general, gospels seem to have been regarded as a special category. Early Christians acknowledged their importance by using conventional or standard-sized codices.

P46 Tendencies in 2 Corinthians: A Critical Examination of the Oldest and Most Inconsistent Extant Papyrus of the Pauline Corpus 
Program Unit: Papyrology and Early Christian Backgrounds
Timothy J. Christian, Asbury Theological Seminary

A brief review of the published literature on P46 shows that little work has been written on this important witness to the Pauline Corpus. While some attention has been given to Romans, 1 Corinthians, and Galatians (and Hebrews), no one has written upon the tendencies of P46 in 2 Corinthians. Thus, in this paper, I have done a full examination of P46 in 2 Corinthians including its singular readings and found that, contra Fredrick Kenyon who published its editio princeps, P46 does not tend to be in alignment with the Alexandrian witness, but rather is wholly inconsistent in (1) giving the original reading according to the NU text and (2) in its agreement with the other extant NT MSS. Overall, I argue that the lasting tendency of P46 is to be inconsistent.

P46 Tendencies in 2 Corinthians: A Critical Examination of the Oldest and Most Inconsistent Extant Papyrus of the Pauline Corpus 
Program Unit: Papyrology and Early Christian Backgrounds
Timothy J. Christian, Asbury Theological Seminary

A brief review of the published literature on P46 shows that little work has been written on this important witness to the Pauline Corpus. While some attention has been given to Romans, 1 Corinthians, and Galatians (and Hebrews), no one has written upon the tendencies of P46 in 2 Corinthians. Thus, in this paper, I have done a full examination of P46 in 2 Corinthians including its singular readings and found that, contra Fredrick Kenyon who published its editio princeps, P46 does not tend to be in alignment with the Alexandrian witness, but rather is wholly inconsistent in (1) giving the original reading according to the NU text and (2) in its agreement with the other extant NT MSS. Overall, I argue that the lasting tendency of P46 is to be inconsistent.

Reconsideration of the War Scroll in a Liturgical Opisthograph From Qumran 
Program Unit: Qumran
Daniel K. Falk, University of Oregon

A very fragmentary papyrus scroll has a copy of Festival Prayers (4Q509+505) on the recto, and on the verso has a copy (or excerpt) of the War Scroll (4Q496) added not many years later (both dated paleographically around the second quarter of the 1st c. BCE). About a century later, someone added to the verso a copy of prayers for days of the week known as Words of the Luminaries (4Q506). What is especially intriguing about this scroll is that the prayers on both sides are form-critically of the same type, with a statement of occasion (“Prayer for the festival of n.”; “Prayer for the n day”), opening with the prayer formula “Remember, O Lord…,” and concluding with the benediction form “Blessed be the Lord who…” It is by no means accidental that these two collections of prayers with the same form for different occasions end up on front and back of the same scroll: they constitute an intentional collection in a personal scroll. This could suggest that the War Scroll – sandwiched between these two – was used as a liturgical text in some way. This paper will reconsider this intriguing but poorly preserved scroll with regard especially to what light it may shed on the possibility of ritual use of the War Scroll. A liturgical function for the War Scroll has occasionally been argued in the past (e.g., Carmignac, North, Krieg, Zhu-En Wee), on the basis of literary and redactional features. This paper will focus on data to be gleaned from the physical characteristics and scribal practices attested in the scroll as a ritual artifact. The investigation will consider whether it is possible to gain a better reconstruction of the scroll a whole, and whether it is likely the scroll contained a complete copy of the War Scroll, an excerpt, or an early version.

The Derveni Papyrus and Its Relevance for Biblical Studies
Program Unit: Corpus Hellenisticum Novi Testamenti
John T. Fitzgerald, University of Notre Dame

This paper provides an introduction to the Derveni papyrus and indicates some of its relevance for biblical studies. The Derveni papyrus, which was the first papyrus to be discovered in Greece, was found in 1962 at a site near Derveni, a mountain pass located approximately 12 km. to the northeast of Thessaloniki. The papyrus dates from the period 350-300 BCE and was discovered in the debris of a funeral pyre that had been lit near a tomb that dates from ca. 300 BCE. The original composition comes from ca. 400 BCE, with the bulk of the work devoted to a thoroughgoing allegorical interpretation of an Orphic poem written ca. 500 BCE. In addition to the papyrus, attention will be given to a magnificent krater, known as the Derveni krater, that was found in another tomb in the nearby area; this krater, which has extensive Dionysiac iconography, provides additional evidence for Orphic theology and beliefs regarding the afterlife.

Readers’ Aids and Other Scribal Practices in Codex Tchacos 
Program Unit: Nag Hammadi and Gnosticism
Lance Jenott, Universitetet i Oslo

While a large amount of attention has been paid to the texts of Codex Tchacos, and especially the Gospel of Judas, with questions concerning the theological views and possible social settings of their original authors (often assumed to have written in Greek in the second and third centuries), this presentation will focus instead on Codex Tchacos as a physical artifact of Egyptian Christianity from the fourth century, and what it reveals about Christian scribal culture at that time. Along with visuals, I will present an overview of the scribal practices employed in copying the manuscript, including various systems of punctuation (dicolons, diplai, empty spaces), page numbers, ekthesis, coronis marks, special ligatures, nomina sacra, so-called diplai sacra, and crucifix iconography. Comparisons will be made with roughly contemporary papyri, including manuscripts discovered near Dishna and Nag Hammadi.

The Status of the Coptic Manuscripts from Oxyrhynchus 
Program Unit: Papyrology and Early Christian Backgrounds
Alexander Kocar, Princeton University

In this presentation, we will focus on the current status of the Coptic materials from the Oxyrhynchus collection. We will provide an overview of the Coptic texts in the collection, briefly introduce some newly discovered manuscripts, and discuss prospects for future research.

“I Courted Nikaia . . . but Her Father Gave Her to Another Man”: On Being a Judean Woman in Hellenistic Egypt 
Program Unit: Hellenistic Judaism
Rob Kugler, Lewis & Clark College

Among the many things that the Judean politeuma papyri from second century BCE Herakleopolis, Egypt teach us is something of the position held by the women of Judean communities in the Hellenistic Egyptian world. Although we hear from them mostly through the voices of men, the women of the Judean community in Herakleopolis still testify revealingly to the opportunities and challenges they experienced in their hybrid cultural setting. From Nikaia who was won over by one man’s courtship but given by her father to another, to Philista whose Judean husband may have tried to use her as the bearer of a loan he made to fellow Judeans, to Berenike who in her own name sued a Judean man for failing to pay the purchase price of slave and the sum of a wet nurse contract, to still others with equally vivid stories to tell—they all reveal a wealth of insight on their daily lives and circumstances. Reading the women of the papyri in light of what scholars imagine to have been the prevailing gender ideologies of the place and time, we see how Judean women in second century BCE Egypt both lived within and tested the boundaries of those frameworks, and we are invited to adjust our judgment of them—the women and the frameworks—accordingly.

The Emergence of the Codex and the Formation of the Pauline Corpus 
Program Unit: Papyrology and Early Christian Backgrounds
Benjamin Laird, University of Aberdeen

In the last century scholars such as John Knox, Edgar Goodspead, Charles Buck, and C. Leslie Mitton have concluded that the initial publication of the Pauline corpus was likely produced on two scrolls rather than on a single codex. Many of the scholars who have embraced this theory have speculated that the original arrangement of the Pauline letters was much different than what can be found in modern biblical translations as well as early witnesses such as P46 which arranged the epistles in the order of decreasing length. One common conclusion which has been made by these scholars is that the initial publication of Paul’s letters would have separated Romans from the Corinthian letters in order that both scrolls might contain a nearly equal amount of material. It was only after the codex was introduced, it has been suggested, that an arrangement of the letters based solely on length was first introduced. In recent decades, however, it has become increasingly apparent that Christian communities adopted the codex much earlier than was previously assumed. It would seem that not only did Christian communities begin to make use of the codex from an early time, but that they preferred it almost exclusively over the scroll. The fact that very few of the oldest extant New Testament papyri were written on scrolls stands in contrast to the preference for the scroll which may be observed in secular literature. In fact, it would appear that in Christian circles, the codex reached a preferred status several centuries before it did so elsewhere. This paper will discuss the possible basis for the early Christian acceptance of the codex as well as the implications the early use of the codex may have had on the initial publication and circulation of the Pauline corpus.

P.Tebt. 894 and Pauline Christianity 
Program Unit: Pauline Epistles
Richard Last, University of Toronto

Some of our information concerning associations comes from Egyptian papyrus accounts. These documents provide detailed records of what associations did, what they ate, what they drank, where they met, and who paid for what when they met. Unlike honorific decrees, group bylaws, and membership lists, association accounts provide us with details of unspectacular features of typical collegium assemblies that Paul perhaps takes for granted while writing to his Christ-groups. P.Tebt 894 (Tebtunis, Egypt; 114 BCE) is our largest surviving association account. It contains information about over 40 meetings the group held. This paper gives a close reading of the papyrus, which has hitherto never been done, and argues that the Tebtunis club represents a financially-modest group rather than a type of "middling" association typically found in the epigraphical sources. The activities undertaken by the Tebtunis group suggest new ways to think about Paul's groups, especially procedure at meetings, financial support and accounting processes, and the social status of their members

Crashing and Burning in Ancient Love Magic: A Comparison of Graeco-Roman and Jewish Forms of Love Magic from a Cognitive Perspective 
Program Unit: Mind, Society, and Religion in the Biblical World
Gabriel Levy, Norwegian University of Science and Technology

The manipulation and regulation of emotion, in particular those emotions associated with love, was one of the most important uses of magic in the Biblical world. Surprisingly there has been no research on this common aspect of magic from a cognitive perspective. This paper initiates research into ancient love magic from a cognitive perspective. First, we gather the extant material evidence for the use of love magic, primarily from corpora in the Cairo Genizah and the Greek Magical Papyri, in order to compare its use in Graeco-Roman and Hebrew-Arabic-Aramaic traditions (broadly Jewish). After a general comparison of the nature of love magic in the two corpora, we then explore three fundamental areas of overlap that can be approached from a cognitive perspective. The first theme we explore is the meta-discursive reflection on the efficacy of magic within the texts themselves. For example, in both corpora many of the magical formulae and instructions evaluate the relative efficacy of the very spell they are describing, appending such terms as “proven” or “proper.” We explore this from the perspective of cognitive dissonance and its more recent revisions since Festinger proposed the idea in the 1950s. Second, we explore the ubiquitous use in both corpora of fire and burning both as a material component in the magical rituals themselves and also in the form of the metaphorical derivatives about fire in reflections about love (e.g. burning as indicative of passionate desire, or alternatively as indicative of anger). Fire has been an interest for cognitive theories of language at least since Lakoff (1987). We will use cognitive metaphor theory in addition to evolutionary arguments about fire to explore some reasons why fire has such a central place. Third, and no less importantly, we analyze the texts according to the sex of the sender and receiver. There is evidence from one of the most well supported theories from evolutionary psychology, “parental investment theory,” that due to the fact that men are uncertain about their own paternity, men and woman have differential reactions to the possibility of infidelity by their sexual partners. One proposed result is that men often feel more jealousy when suspecting sexual infidelity while woman tend to feel more in response to emotional infidelity. Love magic is a useful way to test the theory in the historical record. It also opens up some very important ideas from evolutionary biology about the emotional relations between the sexes that have gone rather unexplored in Biblical studies. There is a tendency in Biblical literature to associate love, fire, and jealousy, as expressed in the most famous verse from Song of Songs (8:6): “. . . love is fierce as death, jealousy hard as sheol; its flames are flames of fire, a divine flame.” Likewise, Graeco-Roman genres that have intersections with magical texts use fire imagery in a similar nexus of love and jealousy, for example when Tibullus writes of his wish that "winds and fire" destroy the wealth of women who deny their lovers access.

"Ten Thousand Monks and Twenty Thousand Nuns": Meeting Monastics at Oxyrhynchus 
Program Unit: Papyrology and Early Christian Backgrounds
AnneMarie Luijendijk, Princeton University

In the late fourth-century, the author of the Historia Monachorum in Aegypto, the main literary testimony of Christians at Oxyrhynchus, boasts that the city abounds with monasteries, both within its walls and outside. He even claims that almost as many monks as lay people inhabit the city, with “ten thousand monks and twenty thousand nuns” under the bishop’s jurisdiction. Scholars generally take this statement as an exaggeration. My paper investigates the documentary evidence for monasticism at Oxyrhynchus in relation to this passage.

The Concept of ‘Community’ and Papyrological Evidence: Oxyrhynchus and Antinoë as Case Studies 
Program Unit: North American Association for the Study of Religion
AnneMarie Luijendijk, Princeton University

The paper uses the papyrological evidence for Christians at Oxyrhynchus and the papyrological, literary, and archaeological evidence from Antinoë (especially regarding the shrine of Saint Colluthus) to discuss methodological issues around constructing Christian communities at these sites.

Scribal Culture and Paratextual Features in the Nag Hammadi and Dishna Codices 
Program Unit: Papyrology and Early Christian Backgrounds
Hugo Lundhaug, Universitetet i Oslo

The discoveries of the Nag Hammadi Codices in 1945 and the Dishna hoard in 1952, reportedly made only 12 kilometers apart, in close vicinity of several late antique monastic settlements, have had considerable impact on scholarship in various fields of Early Christian and Biblical Studies. With the notable exception of James M. Robinson’s pioneering work, however, these discoveries have largely been treated in isolation, within separate fields and scholarly subcommunities. Seldom have codices from the two discoveries been directly compared and their relationship discussed. This paper will contribute to such a study by comparing certain scribal features of the Nag Hammadi and Dishna codices with a view to illuminating the scribal culture(s) on display. The primary focus will be on paratextual features such as titles, layout, sigla, and marginalia.

Christian Literary Papyri from Oxyrhynchus 
Program Unit: Papyrology and Early Christian Backgrounds
Brent Nongbri, Macquarie University

This paper will examine the Greek Christian literary papyri found at Oxyrhynchus. In addition to addressing issues of format, palaeography, and dating, the paper will attempt to relate this literary material with the non-literary Christian papyri from Oxyrhynchus.

ECM – John 
Program Unit: Novum Testamentum Graecum: Editio Critica Maior
Ulrich Schmid, Kirchliche Hochschule Wuppertal/Bethel

215 manuscript copies of John (papyri, majuscules, minuscules, lectionaries) have been fully transcribed and are available on a dedicated website. Moreover, a variant apparatus constructed from these witnesses has been compiled and is being augmented with patristic and versional data. This presentation will show the current state of this work and discuss the tools and state of progress and provisional findings of the research.

Female Diplomats in Jewish Elephantine? A New Look at a Papyrus from the Jedaniah Archive 
Program Unit: Women in the Biblical World
Caryn Tamber-Rosenau, Vanderbilt University

This paper reexamines a fragmentary Aramaic letter on papyrus from the Jedaniah communal archive, which documents the life of a Jewish military colony from the island of Elephantine (Egypt) in the fifth century B.C.E. under Persian rule. The document, TAD A4.4, tells a tale of intrigue involving burglaries, arrests, and failed diplomacy. Many details of the letter escape us on account of the incomplete nature of the text, but it is clear that five men and six women from Elephantine (Syene), with a mix of Yahwistic and non-Yahwistic names, were seized at the gate in Thebes. Scholars have tried to envision the background of the letter, unusual not only in the co-occurrence of apparently Jewish and non-Jewish names but also in the presence of both men and women among the Thebes arrestees. Scholarly treatments have tended to discuss the women’s presence at Thebes as an ancillary fact, as if they were merely wives and daughters along with their men on a business trip. This paper will analyze the internal evidence of TAD A4.4, bring to bear other contemporary material from Elephantine, and propose alternatives for the role of the captured women at Thebes. The paper will argue that TAD A4.4 provides further insight into the roles of women in Elephantine, and it will discuss how and why their roles in this environment might differ from those implied in biblical texts of this period.

Christian Prayer at Oxyrhynchus 
Program Unit: Papyrology and Early Christian Backgrounds
Michael P. Theophilos, Australian Catholic University

The form and content of Christian prayers preserved in fragmentary papyri from Oxyrhynchus contribute to a distinct picture of an emerging and divergent form of early Christianity. This paper will provide a richly illustrated comparative and structural analysis of Christian prayer at Oxyrhynchus, and compare these findings with an examination of the form and function of non-Christian prayers from the same period. In doing so, the pervasive influence of similar non-Christian prayer formulae will be demonstrated at the level of structure, syntax, and titular vocabulary. The preliminary conclusions reached regarding the Oxyrhynchus material will then be juxtaposed with contemporaneous comparative Christian liturgical and individual prayers preserved on papyri from other locations (including texts from the Fayum, Karanis, Kellis, and Hermopolis). This will determine whether our findings of a porous interchange of prayer formulations between Christian and non-Christian prayers at Oxyrhynchus are more broadly attested throughout Egypt and the Mediterranean world or are demonstrably a local trait of the city of Oxyrhynchus.

Letters of Recommendation: A Literary Analysis of the Documentary Papyri and Its Relation to the Corinthians
Program Unit: Papyrology and Early Christian Backgrounds
David I. Yoon, McMaster Divinity College

It may be unintentional or subconscious when contemporary readers of Scripture interpret the ancient text according to modern cultural notions. Certainly, regarding the ancient letter of recommendation, it is tempting for a modern interpreter to understand the statements in 2 Corinthians in light of contemporary conceptions of letters of recommendation, especially in light of the academic contexts most interpreters are associated with. Drawing upon the epistolary work by Clinton Keyes and Chan Hie Kim, as well as the literary theory of Norman Peterson, and by examining a selection of the documentary papyri, this article attempts to understand the nature of the ancient letter of recommendation to construct a hypothetical letter of recommendation that the writer of 2 Corinthians would be referring to in 2 Cor 3:1–2 to provide a clearer picture of what is meant when the writer calls the Corinthians his letter of recommendation.

God Only Knows by The Beach Boys

The Pet Sounds album by The Beach Boys was released in 1966. The album ranks in the top ten of almost everyone's list of best albums (English/American culture). It's #2 on Rolling Stone's list of the 500 Greatest Albums of All Tine.

I wasn't a big fan of the album but I adored God only knows, and I still do.1 It's one of my top ten favorite songs. The song ranks at #25 in Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Songs of All Time. Paul McCartney, who played for another popular group in the 1960s, says that God Only Knows is his favorite song of all time.

The music was written by Brian Wilson2 and the lyrics are by Tony Asher. I don't know very much about music so you'll have to read the Wikipedia article to appreciate why so many people admire Brian Wilson. Carl Wilson, Brian's younger brother, sings the song.

The video is from Good Timin': Live at Knebworth England 1980. It's one of the rare occasions after 1965 when all six Beach Boys (Brian Wilson, Dennis Wilson, Carl Wilson, Mike Love, Al Jardine and Bruce Johnston) are together. I think it's the only video where Brian Wilson is playing on God Only Knows. (That's him on the piano.)

I never saw a live performance of the original Beach Boys but I've seen the Mike Love version twice.



1. Some atheists will never like this song because it mentions God. That sort of thing doesn't bother me. I can still sing God Save the Queen and the Canadian national anthem without batting an eyelash. There are much more important things to fret about.

2. I just read in the Wikipedia article that he was inspired by the Lovin' Spoonful song You Didn't Have to Be So Nice. That song is also one of my personal favorites but I never twigged to the similarity until now.


Saturday, November 23, 2013

Little Richie Dawkins

One thing that draws me to the ID movement is that it has the polite and understated ethic that science is supposed to have -- but does not have when the subject is evolution.

Stephen A. Batzer
Here's a video that was posted today on Uncommon Descent by Salvador Cordova. Before watching it, read my post on: Why are Darwinists do uncivil?. It links to an IDiot post by Stephen A. Batzer where he complains about "Darwinists" being uncivil.

Here's one of the points that Batzer makes ...
Thought leaders in the Darwinian movement, such as Dawkins, Prothero, Shermer and so on, inculcate and advocate incivility by their own example. Look at the way biologist James Shapiro and philosopher Jerry Fodor have been treated. It's ugly.
The video was produced by Mike Booth. Decide for yourself if the evolution side of the debate behaves like the IDiots. (Apologies to Richard Dawkins for propagating this nonsense but people need to see the depths to which the Intelligent Design Community can sink.)


UPDATE: Denyse O'Leary has responded to this post [Huh? Actually, we thought Little Richie (Dawkins) was a special creation, just for us…]. She says, "Moran thinks it originated in the ID community. Unclear why because it’s really not about our usual questions and concerns." Actually I don't know anything about Mike Booth or whether he is a support of Intelligent Design Creationism. I looked, but I couldn't find anything. What I do know is that IDiots like Denyse O'Leary post the obnoxious video on their websites. O'Learly also says this about the video, "It’s also not a lot nastier than the old showman himself." I think I'll let intelligent people decide for themselves who is nastier. I'm glad that Denyse O'Leary at least acknowledges that the video she posted was nasty.


Unchained Melody by The Rightous Brothers

Is it true that the music of the Baby Boomers is a whole lot better than the music of Generation-X or the Millennials (Generation-Y)? Of course it's true. Those whippernappers couldn't touch the best music of the 1960s.

Here's a song that makes my top ten list, although I will admit that it's only #374 on 500 Greatest Songs of All Time. I'm pretty sure this must be a mistake. Rolling Stone also seems to have made a mistake with #9.


(For some strange reason, my son and daughter don't seem to appreciate the music of my generation. I don't know where I went wrong.)


A new definition of kindness and empathy? (on educating children)

Today's version of the Toronto Star has several articles on kindness and empathy. The feature article appears on the front page of the "Insight" section. The title of the print version is "Kindness: A fledgling movement aims to instil empathy and make us a kinder, gentler, society." The online version is How to fight meanness? Try a bit of kind.1

The article is written by education reporter Louise Brown. The gist of the article is that we need to teach empathy and kindness2 and perhaps the schools should be involved. But the main teachers should be parents.
Read more »

Friday, November 22, 2013

Denyse O'Leary is at it again! (re: junk DNA)

In Denyse O'Leary's latest post she claims (again) that "Darwin's followers" used junk DNA as an argument for their position [What? Darwin’s followers did not use junk DNA as an argument for their position?].

No, Denyse, "Darwin's followers" (i.e. adaptationists) never used the presence of large amounts of junk DNA as evidence of the power of natural selection. Such a position would be absurd. The vast majority of "Darwin's followers" were opposed to the idea of large amounts of junk in a genome. Many still are.

Read this post and the links it contains: Darwinists Don't Believe in Junk DNA. You might enjoy my critique of Jonathan Wells book. (You can read, can't you?)

Denyse, you and the other IDiots are confused about a lot of things but this particular debate seems to have you all completely flummoxed. None of you seem to be capable of listening or of understanding simple logic.

It's true that many supporters of evolution evolutionary biologists like Francis Collins, Richard Dawkins, and Ken Miller used the presence of similar pseudogenes in different species as powerful evidence for common descent. They also pointed out that IDiots have a hard time explaining such pseudogenes. A direct challenge, by the way, that IDiots have avoided.

It's true that pseudogenes are junk. That does not mean that Collins, Dawkins, and Miller believe that most of our genome is junk. They are not saying that because most of our genome is junk, evolution must be true.

Denyse doesn't buy this when a commenter on her blog tried to explain it. She asks,
Question for readers here: Is it a sign of weakness in the Darwinians’ position that they can’t acknowledge that they made mistakes? They seem to have to defend, then deny.
Oops! Did I forget to tell you to turn off your irony meters? Sorry.


Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it

  • November 22, 1963: President John F. Kennedy was assassinated.
  • April 4, 1968: Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated.
  • June 6, 1968: Robert F. Kennedy was assassinated.
  • July 21, 1969: Neil Armstrong walks on the moon.
You tell me that I need to forget these events as though they never happened?

You tell me that you don't care because you weren't born yet?

This post was prompted by something that Andrea Habura wrote on Facebook. She says that she is an "R&D Scientist at Next Advance, Inc." Here's what she wrote ...
The demographics of Camelot: As you will no doubt have heard by now, today is the 50th anniversary of the Kennedy assassination. I've also been repeatedly informed that everyone is still shocked and saddened by it, and that "we" will never forget how we felt when we heard the news.

Dear newscasters: Most Americans were either not alive yet, or too young to notice. Only 25% of Americans are over 55 (http://www.indexmundi.com/united_states/demographics_profile.html), and some of them were living in other countries in 1963. To most of us, the shooting in Dallas was about like what happened in Ford's Theater, with the exception that our teachers seemed to feel *really* strongly about it. Let it go.
Just for the record, I understand how my parents felt on May 5, 1945 (VE Day) even though I wasn't born yet. I understand how they felt when Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by atomic bombs. I think I know how they felt on March 29, 1945 when President Roosevelt died.

I understand what my parents and my grandparents went through on October 29, 1929 when the stock market crashed and life's saving were lost. I listened when they told me of the pain and suffering during the great depression. I never told them to "let it go."

I'd like to think I know how traumatic it must have been for Americans on April 15, 1865 even though I wasn't there.
Dear Andrea,

The world did not begin when you were born. Listen and learn from your elders. You will be a better person.
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
                                                                        George Santayana


On a Friday Afternoon 50 Years Ago

It was about 3pm and I was sitting in my geometry class at Nepean High School in Ottawa, Canada. This was my final year of high school. I liked this course and I liked my teacher (Mr. Pollack).

The loudspeaker crackled and I heard the Principle's voice. Mr. Callan said that President Kennedy had been shot and killed in Dallas.

Kennedy was not my President but it was still a great shock. It seemed like Camelot had been destroyed.1 I spent the next three days in front of the television set. Nobody knew what was going to happen to America.

You know how everyone says they know exactly where they were and what they were doing when major events happen? That's certainly true for me on the day John F. Kennedy was assassinated. It's one of only two days in my life that I remember so vividly.2 If it was traumatic for a young Canadian boy, I can't imagine what it must have felt like for Americans.

How many of you remember Nov. 22, 1963?

It looks very naive now but back in 1963 we really believed that Camelot and King Arthur could be real. Here's Richard Burton in the Broadway production. It seems like everybody had the album.



1. The musical, Camelot had been playing on Broadway since 1960 and everyone was familiar with the music from the LP (record album). The Kennedy family and the Kennedy administration were intimately associated with the idea of Camelot.

2. The other was Sept. 11, 2001.

Thursday, November 21, 2013

What Could Possibly Be Wrong with Putting a Cute Dog on the Cover of Science?

Nothing could be wrong until you realize that Science writer editor Elizabeth ("Liz") Pennisi is behind it. That changes things entirely.

To find out why you have to read Dan Graur's latest at: A Dog on the Cover of @ScienceMagazine: Sins of Omissions.

At some point, the big bosses at Science magazine are going to have to wake up to the fact that they're publishing a lot of bad papers and commentaries. Something is seriously wrong.

David Klinhoffer likes Elizabeth Pennisi: Shooting the Messenger: Elizabeth Pennisi. He says ...
As we frequently hasten to emphasize about daring writers and researchers in science, I have no reason to think Pennisi is a Darwin skeptic much less a proponent of ID. Still, she's a reporter who is open to promoting "evolution heresy." She's unafraid to challenge the old guard. More than once she has stuck her finger in the eye of ancient régime. Now you know why she ticks off guys like Graur and Moran.
Yep. He got that right. Graur and I are definitely part of the old regime and we don't like people who promote evolution heresy ... or their sycophants.


Claudiu Bandea Shows Why Attacking Dan Graur Is a Very Bad Idea

Claudiu Bandea is a frequent commenter on this blog. Whenever the subject of junk DNA comes up he reminds us that he had a theory over twenty years ago. Now he has published(?) an advertisement at: On the concept of biological function, junk DNA and the gospels of ENCODE and Graur et al.. Here's the abstract ...
In a recent article entitled “On the immortality of television sets: "function" in the human genome according to the evolution-free gospel of ENCODE”, Graur et al. dismantle ENCODE’s evidence and conclusion that 80% of the human genome is functional. However, the article by Graur et al. contains assumptions and statements that are questionable. Primarily, the authors limit their evaluation of DNA’s biological functions to informational roles, sidestepping putative non-informational functions. Here, I bring forward an old hypothesis on the evolution of genome size and on the role of so called ‘junk DNA’ (jDNA), which might explain C-value enigma. According to this hypothesis, the jDNA functions as a defense mechanism against insertion mutagenesis by endogenous and exogenous inserting elements such as retroviruses, thereby protecting informational DNA sequences from inactivation or alteration of their expression. Notably, this model couples the mechanisms and the selective forces responsible for the origin of jDNA with its putative protective biological function, which represents a classic case of ‘fighting fire with fire.’ One of the key tenets of this theory is that in humans and many other species, jDNAs serves as a protective mechanism against insertional oncogenic transformation. As an adaptive defense mechanism, the amount of protective DNA varies from one species to another based on the rate of its origin, insertional mutagenesis activity, and evolutionary constraints on genome size.
It's not a good idea to attack someone who; (a) is an expert in the field, (b) is intelligent and outspoken, and (c) has a blog. But that never stopped Claudiu Bandea before so why should it now?

Here's part of how Dan Graur responds at: A Pre-Refuted Hypothesis on the Subject of “Junk DNA”. There's more, read it all.
The first problem with this hypothesis is that big eukaryotic genomes consist mostly of very few active transposable elements and numerous dead transposable elements. So, big genomes seem to need little protection. Moreover, a positive correlation exists between genome size and number of transposable elements. In 2002, Margaret Kidwell published a paper entitled “Transposable elements and the evolution of genome size in eukaryotes.” In it, she showed that an approximately linear relationship exists between total transposable element DNA and genome size. Copy numbers per family of transposable elements were found to be low and globally constrained in small genomes, but to vary widely in large genomes. Thus, the major characteristic of large genomes is the absence of selective constraint on transposable element copy number.

Given that the vast majority of transposable elements are dead, the most parsimonious explanation is that the continuous accumulation of dead transposable elements is the reason for genomes becoming large. Let me spell it out: the “large” part in “large genomes” is made of transposable elements. Genome do not become large first and then protect genetic information by becoming sinks of transposable elements.

The other problem with the protection-from-mutation hypothesis is that it assumes selection on mutation to be effective. Selection on mutation is referred to in population genetics as second-order selection. The reason is that this type of selection is anticipatory. It protects against a possibility, not an actuality. Second-order selection on mutation (mutability) requires huge effective population sizes, so huge in fact that they are only found in a few bacteria and viruses. Unfortunately for the protection-from-mutation hypothesis, genome size is known to be inversely correlated with effective population size. In other words, huge genomes are found in species that have very small effective population sizes. So small, in fact, that even regular selection (first-order selection) is not very effective.

Thomas Huxley was proven right again: "The great tragedy of Science is the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact." Several ugly facts in this case.
I can't count the number of people who have tried to explain to Claudiu Bandea that his idea is ridiculous. Hopefully, this last embarrassment will silence him.

Naturally, the Intelligent Design Creationists are all over it [Another response to Darwin’s followers’ attack on the “not-much-junk-DNA” ENCODE findings].


Which Way Did Darwin Walk?

For some reason the title reminds me of "What Does the Fox Say." Oh well, PZ Myers is desperately interested in knowing which way Darwin walked when he took a stroll on the Sandwalk [An important historical question!].

I know which way PZ walked 'cause I led him!


Sylvia Browne Blows Another Psychic Prediction

I first became aware of Syvlia Brown when I saw her on Larry King Live ten years ago [Interview with Sylvia Browne]. As most of you know, Larry King is a real sucker for quacks of all types and he used to let psychics like Sylvia Browne respond to listeners who called in to the show. It was always good for a laugh.

In the middle of that part of the show we have this exchange.

KING: OK. Do you know when you're going to die?

BROWNE: Yes. When I'm 88.

Later on I was happy to post a link to Anderson Cooper's debunking of Sylvia Browne on CNN [Psychic Sylvia Browne Is Nothing but a Con Artist and a Fake].

Sylvia Browne died yesterday [Psychic Sylvia Browne, famous for TV appearances, dies at 77]. She was 77 years old. Only off by 11 years.


[Hat Tip: PZ Myers: Didn’t see that one coming]

Is Baker's Yeast a Good Model for the Evolution of Multicellularity?

R. Ford Denison has an excellent blog called This Week in Evolution. He recently posted an article about the evolution of multicellularity [Evolving-multicellularity lab exercises]. That post contains a link to a paper he recently published with a former student (Ratcliff et al., 2013). Here's the abstract.
Multicellularity was one of the most significant innovations in the history of life, but its initial evolution remains poorly understood. Using experimental evolution, we show that key steps in this transition could have occurred quickly. We subjected the unicellular yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to an environment in which we expected multicellularity to be adaptive. We observed the rapid evolution of clustering genotypes that display a novel multicellular life history characterized by reproduction via multicellular propagules, a juvenile phase, and determinate growth. The multicellular clusters are uniclonal, minimizing within-cluster genetic conflicts of interest. Simple among-cell division of labor rapidly evolved. Early multicellular strains were composed of physiologically similar cells, but these subsequently evolved higher rates of programmed cell death (apoptosis), an adaptation that increases propagule production. These results show that key aspects of multicellular complexity, a subject of central importance to biology, can readily evolve from unicellular eukaryotes.
Here's the problem. Most fungi are multicellular and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (budding yeast) almost certainly evolved from an ancestor that could form hyphae. In fact, wild-type diploid strains or Saccharomyces cerevisiae will form multicellular filaments (pseudohypha) in response to starvation for nitrogen (Liu et al., 1996).

Many of the common lab strains have lost the ability to form multicellular pseudohyphae because they carry a nonsense mutation in the FLO8 gene (Liu et al., 1996). Presumably, those strains have been selected by bakers and brewers over the past several thousand years.

In their discussion, Ratcliff et al. (2012) say ...
Although known transitions to complex multicellularity, with clearly differentiated cell types, occurred over millions of years, we have shown that the first crucial steps in the transition from unicellularity to multicellularity can evolve remarkably quickly under appropriate selective conditions.
I don't this this is quite fair since the yeast strain is just reverting to a primitive condition. This might only have required one or a few mutations. It's not a very good model for de novo evolution of multicellarity.

The work from Gerry Fink's lab (e.g. Liu et al. 1996) is a good example of why we should be cautious using yeast as a model for anything. The yeast strains used in the lab have been selected for specific characteristics since bread-making and beer-making were first invented over 4000 years ago. We need to be cautious about drawing general conclusions based on work with lab yeast strains.

The lab exercise based on the Ratcliff et al. (2012) paper [Experimental Evolution of Multicellularity] may be interesting but it's also misleading. The description of that experiment implies that students are reproducing the ancient evolution of multicellularity from single-cell organisms. Instead, what students are actually looking at is the reversion of a derived, exclusively single-cell strain, to the more primitive multicellular state. That's not the same thing.


[Photo Credit: That's Ford at a rally in Ottawa where we were protesting the Conservative government's clamp-down on science in Canada. He took advantage of the audience to advertise his book.

Liu, H., Styles, C.A. and Fink, G.R. (1996) Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C has a mutation in FL08, a gene required for filamentous growth. Genetics 144:967-978. [PDF]

Ratcliff, W.C., Denison, R.F., Borrello, M. and Travisanoa, M. (2012) Experimental evolution of multicellularity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 109:1595-1600. [doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115323109]

Anne Boud’hors Le Canon 8 de Chénouté D’après le manuscrit Ifao Copte 2 et les fragments complémentaires

IF1075, ISBN 978-2-7247-0615-4 2013 Collection: BEC 212 vol., 808 p., 90 €Anne Boud’horsLe Canon 8 de Chénouté
D’après le manuscrit Ifao Copte 2 et les fragments complémentaires Chénouté (IVe-Ve siècle), abbé du grand monastère de Haute-Égypte connu sous le nom de « monastère Blanc » et écrivain copte par excellence, a composé neuf tomes de sermons de discipline monastique, appelés Canons. Comme tous les manuscrits de la bibliothèque du monastère, dispersés après leur découverte à la fin des années 1880, ces volumes ne nous sont parvenus qu’à l’état très fragmentaire. Le Canon 8 constitue une heureuse exception, puisqu’un exemplaire datable du VIIIe siècle, et présent dans les collections de l’Ifao depuis plus de cent ans, se trouve presque intégralement conservé. C’est la description de ce manuscrit, son édition et la traduction des différents sermons qu’il contient, ainsi que la reproduction en couleurs de toutes les pages conservées au Caire, qui font l’objet de cette publication. L’accès à ce témoin précieux devrait intéresser tout autant les historiens du livre et les spécialistes de langue copte, que les historiens de ce monachisme égyptien dont Chénouté fut l’un des représentants les plus passionnés, mettant à le servir toutes les ressources d’une rhétorique enflammée et subtile. Shenoute (4th-5th Cent.), the abbot of the great monastery in Upper Egypt known as “White Monastery”, is considered as the Coptic writer par excellence, being the author of nine books of so-called Canons, or sermons on monastic discipline. Scattered after their discovery in the late 1880’s, like all manuscripts from the Monastery’s library, these volumes have reached us only in a very fragmentary state. Canon 8 is a welcome exception, as a copy, dated 8th Century and preserved up to 80%, has been kept in the collection of Ifao for over a hundred years. Presented here are the description, edition and translation of the various sermons contained in the manuscript, with colour reproductions of all the pages stored in Cairo. Such a valuable testimony should be of great interest to scholars in book history and Coptic language, as well as in Egyptian monasticism—which Shenoute, one of its most passionate representatives, served with a fiery and subtle rhetoric.

Textbook Publishers Respond to Texas School Board: "Up yours!"

There are a lot of myths surrounding the influence of the Texas Board of Education on the content of biology textbooks. Most people seem to think that major publishers have watered down or eliminated evolution in response to pressure from the Texas board. There's very little evidence to support that claim.

In any case, the situation has changed as reported by Josh Rosenau on the NCSE website [What’s the Future of Texas Textbook Battles?].
The adoption process ending this week will be the first science textbook adoption in a decade. Creationists on the board opened the door to abuses with the standards they passed in 2009, and lame duck board members after the 2012 elections snuck in ideologically-driven textbook reviewers. This summer, these reviewers attacked evolution and climate change in biology textbooks, looking to influence publishers and the board. The hope was that the board’s influence over purchasing decisions would be powerful enough to compel publishers to undercut the science.

But publishers are stronger now. A 2011 law (passed in response to the absurd process in 2009 and 2010) allows local districts to buy any book they want, whether or not it’s on the board’s approved list. Districts are still going to prefer an approved textbook, but if the board goes too far, local districts can opt for a book not on the list, which means the publishers can walk away from the adoption process rather than weaken their textbooks. This science standards adoption is the first under the new law, a test case for battles to come (especially next year’s social studies textbook adoption).

So far, the publishers are standing strong. Creationists pushed them to water down evolution coverage, but they seem to be finding ways around the reviewers’ suggestions. As Ron Wetherington (who won a Friend of Darwin Award from NCSE in honor of his work on the 2009 standards) told the Dallas Observer "I reviewed the publisher’s response to this. In this particular case, the publisher said, ‘Up yours, we’re not going to change anything.’" We don’t yet know whether the state education agency will accept that response and recommend these textbooks for adoption.
Here's the view from TFN Insider [Important News: Publishers Are Resisting Pressure to Dumb Down Their Biology Textbooks for Texas].
We have now had our first look at changes publishers have submitted in response to objections — many of them attacks on evolution and climate change science — raised by official state review teams evaluating new science textbooks for Texas. And we have very encouraging news:

All 14 publishers are refusing to water down or compromise instruction on evolution and climate change in their proposed new high school biology textbooks.

These publishers deserve our thanks for standing up to pressure from right-wing politicians and activists working to corrupt the science in our children’s textbooks.
Contrast this with the question asked by Paul Waldman a few months ago [The Missing Piece in Coverage of Texas Evolution Controversies].
So here's the missing piece: what about the textbook companies? When this issue is discussed, the publishers are talked about as if they have no agency, no ability to affect the outcome of these events. But they're morally culpable for participating in these farces. If they wanted, they could stand up to the state of Texas. So how can the people who work at a publisher in good conscience agree to write a biology textbook that treats evolution as a wild, unsupported idea? What if the Texas Board of Education demanded that their books discuss the "controversy" about whether the Earth travels around the sun or vice-versa, or the "controversy" about whether earthquakes happen because the turtle on whose back the world sits is scratching an itch, or the "controversy" about whether stars are actually faeries winking at us from up in the sky? Would the publishers say, "OK, if that's what you want, we'll write it and print it"? Someone should ask them where they draw the line on their integrity.
This was gleefully cross-posted to Jerry Coyne's blog website [Textbooks and Texas] where his sycophants jumped all over me for suggesting that publishers were not actually modifying their textbooks in any significant way.

Here's an excerpt from Jerry Coyne's latest post [Creationism on life support at the Texas Board of Education].
This week the Texas Board of Education will consider which biology texts to “recommend” for Texas public-school students. I say “recommend” rather than “adopt” because the rules have changed. The list of approved books, from which all school districts were once required to choose, is now gone, and the Board can only recommend books. Texas school districts can now choose whichever books they want to use, including material from the Internet. That’s a huge bonus to publishers, who used to have to rewrite many of their biology and history books so they’d be acceptable to Texas, largely purging them of evolution and giving a more conservative point of view on American history. Now they won’t have to do that, and publishers are beginning to resist such changes anyway. If all the publishers resisted, Texas wouldn’t have any books to buy!
I still think it's misleading to say that publishers "used to have to rewrite many of their biology ... books so they’d be acceptable to Texas, largely purging them of evolution." I've got copies of Miller & Levine's biology textbooks, for example, and they cover evolution quite well. I could be wrong but I don't think the Texas Board of Education ever rejected a biology textbook. They were all on the list of "approved" textbooks even though they covered evolution.


Oops! MOOCs Didn't Work Out So Good for Sebastian Thrun

From Tressie McMillan Cottom at tressiemc [The Audacity: Thrun Learns A Lesson and Students Pay].
Sebastian Thrun, founder of Udacity, one of the most high-profile private sector attempts to "disrupt" higher education discovered inequality this week. Thrun has spent the last three years dangling the shiny bauble of his elite academic pedigree and messianic vision of the future of higher education before investors and politicos. He promised nothing short of radically transforming higher education for the future by delivering taped classroom lessons of elite professors through massive open online courses. So what went wrong?

After low performance rates, low student satisfaction and faculty revolt, Thrun announced this week that he has given up on MOOCs as a vision for higher education disruption. The "godfather of free online education" says that the racially, economically diverse students at SJSU [San Jose State University], "were students from difficult neighborhoods, without good access to computers, and with all kinds of challenges in their lives…[for them] this medium is not a good fit." It seems disruption is hard when poor people insist on existing.
Thrun's goal was to market lectures by "elite" professors at places like Sanford1. His new company, Udacity, was going to make tons of money by selling lists of successful students to private companies who are looking for talent. Guess what? It turns out that there are lots of disadvantaged students in introductory courses at SJSU who don't learn from lectures given by elite Stanford professors. Who would have guessed?

In case you've forgotten the hype that Sebastian Thrun created when he formed Udacity, read: Sebastian Thrun Will Change Education. And watch the video.



1. My position on this is that the professors at Harvard and Stanford are not necessarily the best teachers. In my field of biochemistry, for example, we have direct evidence that professors at MIT do a horrible job of teaching biochemistry [Where Are the Best University Teachers?]. In my experience, the best biochemistry teachers are often located at small colleges where they pay attention to the latest pedagogical literature and actually read the textbooks they use in class.