Michael Shermer and Bill Dembski debated evolution and intelligent design last night. You can read two very different versions of the debate.
Jason Rosenhouse posted a summary on The Panda's Thumb. He thought Shermer was good and Dembski wasn't.
Salvador Cordova over at Uncommon Descent says Dembski won the debate.
Basing my conclusion entirely on the credibility of the two reporters, I'd say Shermer had a good night.
No comments:
Post a Comment