I'm glad Barrack Obama won the election. He is much less conservative than John McCain and much more likely to do good things for America.
Change is in the air, everybody is talking about a new direction for America under Barack Obama. What kind of changes can we expect? Here's a sample from last night's vote on several propositions [CNN.com].
This measure would amend the state constitution so that only a union between one man and one woman would be valid or recognized as a marriage in the state. A similar measure was on the ballot in 2006 but failed.According to the exit poll [Arizona Prop.102], 67% of Protestants voted to ban gay marriage as did 51% of Catholics. About 13% of voters said they had no religion and 69% of them voted against Proposition 102.
This measure would prohibit unmarried "sexual partner[s]" from adopting children or from serving as foster parents. The measure specifies that the prohibition applies to both opposite-sex as well as same-sex couples.According to the exit poll [Arkansas Initiative 1], the voters are evenly split between Democrats, Republicans, and Independents. Democrats voted against the initiative (52%) but the other two groups voted in favor of the ban. A majority of college graduates (52%) and those with postgraduate education (54%) voted in favor of the ban on adoptions.
This measure would amend the state constitution to specify that only marriages between one man and one woman would be recognized as valid in the state. If passed, the measure would trump a May 2008 ruling by the California Supreme Court that legalized same-sex marriage.According to the exit poll [California Proposition 8], a majority of whites (53%) and Asians (53%) voted against Proposition 8 while a majority of African-Americans (70%) and Latinos (51%) voted in favor of the ban. Democrats (65%) and Independents (56%) were against the ban but 81% of Republicans voted in favor of the ban on gay marriage.
This measure would amend the state constitution to define the term "person" to include "any human being from the moment of fertilization." This definition would be applied to all aspects of the state constitution, including the provisions that ensure that no person has his or her life, liberty, or property taken away without due process of law. Thus, the measure would essentially have the effect of banning abortion.According to the exit poll [Colorado Amendment 48], this amendment should have been approved by a substantial majority.
This measure would amend the state constitution to define marriage as a union between one man and one woman. In order to amend the Florida constitution, 60 percent of voters must vote in favor of the amendment.According to the exit poll [Florida Amendment 2], 71% of Protestants and 66% of Catholics voted in favor of the amendment to ban gay marriage. A majority of Whites (60%), African-Americans (71%), and Latinos (64%) voted for the ban.
This measure would prohibit all abortions in the state except in cases where mother's life or health is at risk or in cases of rape or incest for pregnancies of less than 20 weeks. A similar measure that did not include exceptions for rape or the health of the mother was on the ballot in 2006, but was rejected by voters 44 to 56 percent.According to the exit poll [South Dakota Initiative 11], only evangelical born-again Christians and conservative Republicans supported the initiative. A majority of all other groups voted against it.
This measure would allow terminally ill, competent, adult residents of the state to request and self-administer lethal medication prescribed by a physician. The person requesting to end his or her life must be medically predicted to have six months or less to live.According to the exit poll [Washington Initiative 1000], this initiative was supported by liberals (81%) and moderates (63%) and opposed by conservatives (66%). There are more liberals (29% of the voters) than in most states. Republicans (63%) voted against the initiative while Democrats (75%) and Independents (59%) voted for it.
No comments:
Post a Comment